Let’s face it, a one-hour video summary and analysis is not the way to experience classic literature. I am probably robbing myself of some of the joy of reading and experiencing these novels by getting them spoonfed to me in indigestible lumps. On the other hand, who can read a novel in an hour? Not me.
I was already familiar with a lot of 1984’s symbolism and ideology. Big Brother, 2+2=5 (or as Picard would say: “There…are…four…lights!”), even The Party’s influence over history. I find the details of Newspeak fascinatingly horrifying. I feel like I have a better idea how to answer the 3 questions for 1984 than for Great Gatsby. A lot of what made Gatsby a great book was in the actual writing whereas more of 1984’s greatness comes from the ideas. I’ll prep responses for both. I want to start doing 3 a week so I’ll have a good 9 or 10 to draw from when I reach the actual test. I really suspect I’ll be writing about Shakespeare since it’s pretty well guaranteed to have something of his on the list, but we’ll see. It would be nice if I could write on Orwell or Tolkein instead. But as long as I don’t have to B.S. something about Pride and Prejudice, I’ll be happy.
I think this technique is proving effective. If I get a block of free time (hahaha), I’ll watch 1984 over the computer with Netflix. I also plan to nose through a few SparkNotes online since Rocketbooks’ selections are limited.
Next up: Frankenstein. I read it the summer before 9th grade; it was on a required reading list. I didn’t get it then. No time for the reread right now, but I can Rocketbook it.
I hear mixed comments regarding the accuracy of different film adaptations of Frankenstein. Which is more accurate, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein with DeNiro or the made-for-TV version with Luke Goss? Input from scholarly types appreciated. (You too, Tracie. 🙂